One more reason to check internet sources – inaccurate history books
Twenty-first century skills.
My teenage son says
ya gotta be good on the tubes.
Different vocabulary but they have the same meaning – all of us need the ability to navigate the online world of multimedia. A recent textbook brouhaha in Virginia highlights how important these skills can be.
Joy Masoff, author of books such as Oh, Yuck! The Encyclopedia of Everything Nasty and Oh, Yikes! History’s Grossest Moments, wrote a fourth-grade history textbook for the state of Virginia. The book titled, Our Virgina: Past and Present, included a paragraph claiming that thousands of African American slaves fought on the side of the Confederacy during the American Civil War. A review committee made up of three elementary teachers and no content specialist approved the book for state-wide adoption.
Apparently no one involved noticed the passage until the parent of a fourth-grader, moonlighting as an historian at the College of William and Mary, came across the reference while browsing through the text.
A Virgina Department of Education spokesperson called the passage
outside mainstream Civil War scholarship.
When questioned by reporters, Masoff and her publisher provided three web links which Massof used as her source for the passage.
All three links cite work done by the Sons of Confederate Veterans. The SCV is based in Columbia, Tennessee and disputes the widely accepted view that slavery was the main cause of the Civil War. The group’s web site claims that Confederate soldiers took up arms to protect their homes “from an illegal invasion” and argues that the war was fought
to preserve their homes and livelihood.
According to the Washington Post, John Sawyer, chief of staff of the Sons of Confederate Veterans’ Army of Northern Virginia, is happy that a state textbook accepted some of its views. Respected historians disagree with these revisionist views:
Pulitzer Prize-winning historian James McPherson of Princeton University said, “These Confederate heritage groups have been making this claim for years as a way of purging their cause of its association with slavery.”
The whole thing seems a bit like some sort of Comedy Central episode. We’ve got a history textbook written by someone who’s not an historian, an author who didn’t evaluate her online sources, a publisher who didn’t provide adequate oversight and a department of education that created a flawed textbook review system.
But in the end, it comes down to an author who failed to practice what we should be teaching – quality research and evaluation skills. Masoff told the Post that she was “unaware that a number of her sources were members of the Sons of Confederate Veterans.” Whether unintentionally or otherwise, Masoff didn’t do her job. She included information in a history textbook from a source that she failed to evaluate. And the parent who first caught the error knows how big a deal this is:
It’s disconcerting that the next generation is being taught history based on an unfounded claim instead of accepted scholarship. It concerns me not just as a professional historian but as a parent.
So . . . lessons learned?
Think twice about selecting a history textbook whose author also writes encyclopedias about everything nasty. And we need to continue to teach ourselves and our students about how “to be good on the tubes.”
- Share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
- Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
- Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
- Click to share on Google+ (Opens in new window)
- Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
- Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)
- Click to email (Opens in new window)
- Click to print (Opens in new window)