Skip to content

Focus on the doing of social studies, not just the model

Back in the day, Madeline Hunter ruled.

I never actually met Madeline but for a time, it was like we were joined at the hip. College of Ed professors loved her. Principals loved her. Teacher observation and evaluation tools loved her even more. And so all of my early teaching years were focused on her theories and lesson plan designs.

For the non-Boomers in the room, a quick review of Madeline’s design:

  • Anticipatory set
    Do something that introduces the lesson, hooks kids into wanting to learn the lesson, and establish your objectives for the lesson.
  • Direct instruction
    Foundational knowledge – the facts, ideas, and skills – is delivered to the students. Usually some sort of lecture, video, or reading.
  • Guided practice and application
    The teacher helps students apply what they have just been taught.
  • Independent practice and application
    Students apply the learning on their own.
  • Assessment
    The teacher measures how well students have met the objectives.

It’s not like this is terrible instruction. Making it clear to kids what our expectations are is good. Finding ways for them to collect and organize foundation knowledge? Good. Independent application? Absolutely. Done right? Pretty darn good.

But like a lot of things, Madeline’s best intentions rarely made it into actual practice. Back in the day, I was usually okay with step one. I could hook kids into content. But after that? Not so much.

I ended up teaching like I had been taught. How the teachers down the hallway were teaching. Direct instruction to me meant lecture, the occasional video, and a lot of assigned readings. If there was any guided practice and independent practice, it usually involved lots of homework and worksheets.

I got better. I started doing more hands on projects and cooperative learning. But there was still a lot of direct instruction. And while the projects were engaging and kids enjoyed them, I didn’t work super hard at making them relevant or tying them to big ideas. So I had a fun class but I’m not really sure students walked any out any smarter than when they walked in.

As my own kids entered and left social studies classrooms throughout their 13 school years, it became clear that they were having similar experiences. There were some hands on projects and occasional awesomeness (thanks Mr. Robb.)  But they still experienced a lot of direct instruction and “independent” practice in the form of study guides and worksheet packets.

So.

Is it possible to take the best parts of Madeline’s model and adapt it to a world that needs our students to be engaged, informed, and knowledgable citizens? I think so.

For the last year or so, a group of us have been getting together to revise our current state standards. The focus is all about encouraging teachers to incorporate application pieces into their instructional design. And finding ways to tie that application to big ideas that are relevant to their students.

This means clear overarching ideas, better compelling questions, historical thinking skills, and summative assessments that give students flexibility in developing products that address the compelling questions. It’s this last piece – the doing, applying, authentic piece – that we want teachers and kids to focus on.

Here’s a draft version of an infographic we’re messing around with:

I get that some of this won’t make sense without access to the actual draft document. But the idea is simple. Give kids a great compelling and relevant question aligned to a big idea like Choices have Consequences. Help them access evidence that addresses the questions. Design an authentic task that lets them answer the question. And along the way, incorporate effective and proven instructional practices.

Done.

But like Madeline’s model, having a simple infographic doesn’t mean easy. What can it actually look like in practice?

Explore some of these resources:

  • Stanford History Education Group
    The gold standard in history inquiry best practices.
  • Honing Our Questions to Deepen Historical Learning
    Love this article about creating great question and integrating them into lesson design.
  • Doing Social Studies
    The KCSS blog – lots of ideas and strategies.
  • Read Inquire Write
    The people behind RIW started at SHEG and are taking things in a slightly different direction that I like. One of my new faves.
  • C3 Teachers
    I love love love this site. Inquiry Design Models are the next big thing and support what the Kansas standards document is doing. Question. Evidence. Critical thinking. Make a claim that addresses the question. All in one neat package.
  • PBL Works
    Problem-based learning is what good instructional is all about.
  • DocsTeach
    The National Archives interactive take on historical thinking.

And then go and follow these teachers. You’ve got national and state level teachers of the year. You’ve got amazing users of tech. You’ve got proven conference presenters. They’re all rock stars. And they all love talking best practice so don’t be afraid to chat them up.

Make Madeline proud.

3 Comments Post a comment
  1. Why do people love Hunter (http://www.ascd.org/ascd-express/vol6/608-toc.aspx) or Barak Rosenshine (https://www.aft.org/sites/default/files/periodicals/Rosenshine.pdf)?

    Because year after year decade after decade – kids retain more when taught (mainly) using this type of direct instruction. This back to simple lesson structure based on what works is the whole push behind the ResearchEd folks from Britain (invading Philly soon) http://www.johncattbookshop.com/the-researched-guide-to-sen

    I think all the resources in the world are great, but the content needs to be delivered in a way that kids get it or to put a finer point on it – get more of it. FWIW, many SHEG, NewVistions, etc. lessons are structured just this way.

    September 28, 2019
    • glennw #

      Thanks for sharing! Agree 100%. When used correctly and appropriately, the instructional designs you cite can be effective. My concern is that we as social studies teachers often fail to provide what what the Principles of Instruction article describes as “extensive, successful, independent practice in order for skills and knowledge to become automatic.” It is too easy to skip over this step and jump straight to a summative assessment that measures knowledge without a focus on skills.

      And if teachers do include the independent practice step in their design, many too often define “successful and independent practice” as the completion of a worksheet or other low level activity provided as homework rather than any authentic historical or critical thinking and action.

      So . . . absolutely, there is always a need for discipline specific content. But we’re working to find ways to also support the integration of skills and competencies required to be effective citizens as part of every lesson and unit. It’s that piece that we see missing so often in classrooms.

      Appreciate the citations and comments!

      glennw

      September 29, 2019

Trackbacks & Pingbacks

  1. Sharing Diigo Links and Resources (weekly) | Another EducatorAl Blog

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: